To the Top

PHR NPL _Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population)

Choose variables

Mark your selections and choose between table on screen and file format. Marking tips
Mandatory
Field for searching for a specific value in the list box. This is examples of values you can search for.Albania , Andorra , Argentina ,

Selected 0 of total 65

Mandatory
Field for searching for a specific value in the list box. This is examples of values you can search for.1996 , 1997 , 1998 ,

Selected 1 of total 26

Number of selected data cells are:
(maximum number allowed is 500,000)
Number of selected cells exceeds the maximum allowed 500,000

Obs:

Source(s) used: The World Bank: World Development Indicators (WDI) dataset. Original Source: World Bank, Global Poverty Working Group. Data are compiled from official government sources or are computed by World Bank staff using national (i.e. country-specific) poverty lines. Please refer to the country-specific footnotes below for country-specific sources used by the World Bank Global Poverty Working Group. Data downloaded on 23/01/2023. Citation Guidelines:
All data are free for scientific use only. For any other use, please contact the data producer directly to obtain authorization. Please cite the database as follows:
Generations and Gender Programme (Year). Generations and Gender Contextual Database. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (distributor).
Retrieved from: https://www.ggp-i.org/data/ggp-contextual-database/ on Day/Month/Year
If the data downloaded from the GGP Contextual Database comes only from one source (e.g. Eurostat), you might cite it as follows:
Original Source [e.g. Eurostat, © European Union, 1995-2019] (Data obtained through the Generations and Gender Contextual Database. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (distributor). Retrieved from: https://www.ggp-i.org/data/ggp-contextual-database/ on Day/Month/Year)
Please also check the original source for further information on the use of the data and proper citation. Indicator (long name): Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population) Indicator (short name): PHR NPL Definition: National poverty headcount ratio is the percentage of the population living below the national poverty line(s). National estimates are based on population-weighted subgroup estimates from household surveys. For economies for which the data are from EU-SILC, the reported year is the income reference year, which is the year before the survey year. Source of variable definition: The World Bank: World Development Indicators (WDI) dataset Reference areas: Click here to download the list of reference areas and the respective geographical codes.

Country: Albania , Year: 2002

Source: Albania: trends in poverty 2002-2005-2008. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Albania , Year: 2005

Source: Albania: trends in poverty 2002-2005-2008. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Albania , Year: 2008

Source: Albania: trends in poverty 2002-2005-2008. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Albania , Year: 2012

Source: Instat and World Bank (2013). ALBANIA: TRENDS IN POVERTY 2002-2005-2008-2012. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Albania , Year: 2016

Source: Eurostat

Country: Albania , Year: 2017

Source: Eurostat

Country: Albania , Year: 2018

Source: Eurostat

Country: Albania , Year: 2019

Source: Eurostat

Country: Armenia , Year: 2019

Source: National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Armenia , Year: 2020

Source: National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2002

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Austria , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2001

Source: Azerbaijan: Living Conditions Assessment Report, Report No. 52801-AZ, March 2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2007

Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2008

Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2009

Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2010

Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2011

Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2012

Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 1996

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 1997

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 1998

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 1999

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2000

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2001

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2002

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2003

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2004

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2005

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2006

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2007

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2008

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2009

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2010

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2011

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2012

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2013

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2014

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2015

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2016

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2017

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2018

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2019

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Belarus , Year: 2020

Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate

Country: Belgium , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Belgium , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Belgium , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2004

Source: Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty Update: PROTECTING THE POOR DURING THE GLOBAL CRISIS, Report No: 51847-BA, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2007

Source: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Relative poverty line (poverty threshold) is set to the amount of 60% of the median equivalised household consumption expenditure. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2011

Source: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Relative poverty line (poverty threshold) is set to the amount of 60% of the median equivalised household consumption expenditure. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2015

Source: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Relative poverty line (poverty threshold) is set to the amount of 60% of the median equivalised household consumption expenditure. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Bulgaria , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Croatia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Cyprus , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Czechia , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Denmark , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Denmark , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Estonia , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Finland , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: France , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2004

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2005

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2006

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2007

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2008

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2009

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2010

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2011

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2012

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2013

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2014

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2015

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2016

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2017

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2018

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2019

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Georgia , Year: 2020

Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Germany , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Germany , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2002

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Greece , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Hungary , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Hungary , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Hungary , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Hungary , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Hungary , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Hungary , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Iceland , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Ireland , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Ireland , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Italy , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Kosovo , Year: 2012

Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.

Country: Kosovo , Year: 2013

Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.

Country: Kosovo , Year: 2014

Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.

Country: Kosovo , Year: 2015

Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2006

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2007

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2008

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2009

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2010

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2011

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2012

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2013

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2014

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2015

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2016

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2017

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2018

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2019

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2020

Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Latvia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Latvia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Latvia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Latvia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Latvia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Latvia , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Lithuania , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Lithuania , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Lithuania , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Lithuania , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Lithuania , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Luxembourg , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Malta , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2005

Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2007, July 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2006

Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2007

Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2008

Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2009

Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2010

Source: National Source. POVERTY ANALYSIS IN MONTENEGRO IN 2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2011

Source: National Source. POVERTY ANALYSIS IN MONTENEGRO IN 2011. www.monstat.org. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Montenegro , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Netherlands , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Netherlands , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Netherlands , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Netherlands , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Netherlands , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Netherlands , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2002

Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2003

Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2004

Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2005

Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2006

Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2018

Source: State Statistical Office, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2002

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Norway , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 1999

Source: Eurostat

Country: Poland , Year: 2000

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Poland , Year: 2001

Source: Poland: Growth, Employment and Living Standards in Pre-Accession Poland, Report No. 28233-POL, Mar 2004. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2002

Source: Poland: Growth, Employment and Living Standards in Pre-Accession Poland, Report No. 28233-POL, Mar 2004. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Poland , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Portugal , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Republic of Kazakhstan , Year: 2018

Source: The Household Budget Survey of Kazakhstan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Republic of Kazakhstan , Year: 2019

Source: The Household Budget Survey of Kazakhstan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Republic of Kazakhstan , Year: 2020

Source: The Household Budget Survey of Kazakhstan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Republic of Moldova , Year: 2019

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Republic of Moldova , Year: 2020

Source: National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Romania , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT

Country: Romania , Year: 2014

Source: Eurostat

Country: Romania , Year: 2015

Source: Eurostat

Country: Romania , Year: 2016

Source: Eurostat

Country: Romania , Year: 2017

Source: Eurostat

Country: Romania , Year: 2018

Source: Eurostat

Country: Romania , Year: 2019

Source: Eurostat

Country: Romania , Year: 2020

Source: Eurostat

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2000

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2002

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2003

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2004

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2005

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2006

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2007

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2008

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2009

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2010

Source: Rosstat/WDI

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2011

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2012

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2013

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2014

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2015

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2016

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2017

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2018

Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2019

Source: Rosstat/WDI

Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2020

Source: Rosstat/WDI

Country: Serbia , Year: 2002

Source: Living standard Measurement Survey - Serbia 2002 - 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2004

Source: Background Paper on Trends and Profile of Poverty in Serbia: 2004-2006 - Serbia Poverty Assessment, June 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2006

Source: Background Paper on Trends and Profile of Poverty in Serbia: 2004-2006 - Serbia Poverty Assessment, June 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2007

Source: Living standard Measurement Survey - Serbia 2002 - 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2008

Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Poverty in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2009

Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Poverty in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2010

Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Poverty in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Serbia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovakia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovenia , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovenia , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovenia , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovenia , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovenia , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Slovenia , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2003

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2004

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2005

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Spain , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Sweden , Year: 2020

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2006

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2007

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2008

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2009

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2010

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2011

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2012

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2013

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2014

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2015

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2018

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Switzerland , Year: 2019

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 1999

Source: Tajikistan PA 2012 - Input Tajikistan ER. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2003

Source: World Bank (2009). Republic of Tajikistan Poverty Assessment Report No. 51341-TJ. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2007

Source: Information Brief on poverty in Tajikistan prepared by Joost de Laat. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2009

Source: Information Brief on poverty in Tajikistan prepared by Joost de Laat. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2013

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2014

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2015

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2016

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2017

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2018

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2019

Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2001

Source: Eurostat

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2005

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2006

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2007

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2008

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2009

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2010

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2011

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2012

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2013

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2014

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2015

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2016

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2017

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2018

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: Türkiye , Year: 2019

Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)

Country: United Kingdom , Year: 2016

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: United Kingdom , Year: 2017

Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.

Country: Uruguay , Year: 2020

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica de Uruguay (INE) - Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH). Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2001

Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2002

Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2003

Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2004

Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2005

Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2010

Source: Living standards improvement strategy in the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2013-2015. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2011

Source: Living standards improvement strategy in the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2013-2015. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2012

Source: Most Recent Comparable Series:2012,2013. 2nd Most Recent Comparable Series:2010,2011. 3rd Most Recent Comparable Series:2001,2002,2003,2004,2005. The complete series can be downloaded from the databank, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=poverty-and-equity-database.

Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2013

Source: Most Recent Comparable Series:2012,2013. 2nd Most Recent Comparable Series:2010,2011. 3rd Most Recent Comparable Series:2001,2002,2003,2004,2005. The complete series can be downloaded from the databank, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=poverty-and-equity-database.

Country: Argentina , Year: 2016

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Argentina , Year: 2017

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Argentina , Year: 2018

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Argentina , Year: 2019

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.

Country: Argentina , Year: 2020

Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.