To the Top
Jump to main content
The Generations & Gender Contextual Database
/
2 Economy
/
PHR NPL _Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population)
Choose table
Choose variable
Show result
PHR NPL _Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population)
Choose variables
About table
Contact
Arianna Caporali, Institut national d'études démographiques (INED)
9, cours des Humanités
CS 50004
93322 Aubervilliers Cedex
Phone : +33 (0)1 56 06 20 00
e-Mail:
arianna.caporali@ined.fr
Unit
Percentage
Reference time
Oldest data: 1996 Most recent data: 2021
Creation date
1/24/2023
Copyright
Yes
Source
Generations and Gender Contextual Database. See 'Citation guidelines' for proper acknowledgement.
Matrix
CDB_PHR NPL
Mark your selections and choose between table on screen and file format.
Marking tips
Country
Mandatory
--- Select classification ---
Countries by NUTS codes
Countries by OECD codes
Countries by GGP codes
Go to: Select values from group
Field for searching for a specific value in the list box. This is examples of values you can search for.Albania , Andorra , Argentina ,
wave temp fix..
Beginning of word
Selected
0
of total
65
Albania
Andorra
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Canada
China, Hong Kong SAR
China, Taiwan Province of China
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Kosovo
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
New Zealand
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Kazakhstan
Republic of Korea
Republic of Moldova
Romania
Russian Federation
San Marino
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Tajikistan
Türkiye
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States of America
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Select at least one value
Year
Mandatory
Field for searching for a specific value in the list box. This is examples of values you can search for.1996 , 1997 , 1998 ,
wave temp fix..
Beginning of word
Selected
1
of total
26
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
Select at least one value
Number of selected data cells are:
(maximum number allowed is 500,000)
Number of selected cells exceeds the maximum allowed 500,000
Obs:
Source(s) used:
The World Bank: World Development Indicators (WDI) dataset.
Original Source: World Bank, Global Poverty Working Group. Data are compiled from official government sources or are computed by World Bank staff using national (i.e. country-specific) poverty lines. Please refer to the country-specific footnotes below for country-specific sources used by the World Bank Global Poverty Working Group. Data downloaded on 23/01/2023.
Citation Guidelines:
All data are free for scientific use only. For any other use, please contact the data producer directly to obtain authorization. Please cite the database as follows:
Generations and Gender Programme (Year). Generations and Gender Contextual Database. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (distributor).
Retrieved from: https://www.ggp-i.org/data/ggp-contextual-database/ on Day/Month/Year
If the data downloaded from the GGP Contextual Database comes only from one source (e.g. Eurostat), you might cite it as follows:
Original Source [e.g. Eurostat, © European Union, 1995-2019] (Data obtained through the Generations and Gender Contextual Database. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (distributor). Retrieved from: https://www.ggp-i.org/data/ggp-contextual-database/ on Day/Month/Year)
Please also check the original source for further information on the use of the data and proper citation.
Indicator (long name):
Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population)
Indicator (short name):
PHR NPL
Definition:
National poverty headcount ratio is the percentage of the population living below the national poverty line(s). National estimates are based on population-weighted subgroup estimates from household surveys. For economies for which the data are from EU-SILC, the reported year is the income reference year, which is the year before the survey year.
Source of variable definition:
The World Bank: World Development Indicators (WDI) dataset
Reference areas:
Click
here
to download the list of reference areas and the respective geographical codes.
Footnotes
Country: Albania , Year: 2002
Source: Albania: trends in poverty 2002-2005-2008. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Albania , Year: 2005
Source: Albania: trends in poverty 2002-2005-2008. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Albania , Year: 2008
Source: Albania: trends in poverty 2002-2005-2008. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Albania , Year: 2012
Source: Instat and World Bank (2013). ALBANIA: TRENDS IN POVERTY 2002-2005-2008-2012. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Albania , Year: 2016
Source: Eurostat
Country: Albania , Year: 2017
Source: Eurostat
Country: Albania , Year: 2018
Source: Eurostat
Country: Albania , Year: 2019
Source: Eurostat
Country: Armenia , Year: 2019
Source: National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Armenia , Year: 2020
Source: National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2002
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Austria , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2001
Source: Azerbaijan: Living Conditions Assessment Report, Report No. 52801-AZ, March 2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2007
Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2008
Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2009
Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2010
Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2011
Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Azerbaijan , Year: 2012
Source: Statistical yearbook of Azerbaijan, 2013. State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 1996
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 1997
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 1998
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 1999
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2000
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2001
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2002
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2003
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2004
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2005
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2006
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2007
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2008
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2009
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2010
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2011
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2012
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2013
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2014
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2015
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2016
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2017
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2018
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2019
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Belarus , Year: 2020
Source: Social conditions and living standards of the population in the Republic of Belarus. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. The welfare measure used is consumption per adult equivalent. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate
Country: Belgium , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Belgium , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Belgium , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2004
Source: Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty Update: PROTECTING THE POOR DURING THE GLOBAL CRISIS, Report No: 51847-BA, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2007
Source: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Relative poverty line (poverty threshold) is set to the amount of 60% of the median equivalised household consumption expenditure. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2011
Source: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Relative poverty line (poverty threshold) is set to the amount of 60% of the median equivalised household consumption expenditure. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina , Year: 2015
Source: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Relative poverty line (poverty threshold) is set to the amount of 60% of the median equivalised household consumption expenditure. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Bulgaria , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Croatia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Cyprus , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Czechia , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Denmark , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Denmark , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Estonia , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Finland , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: France , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2004
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2005
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2006
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2007
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2008
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2009
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2010
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2011
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2012
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2013
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2014
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2015
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2016
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2017
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2018
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2019
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Georgia , Year: 2020
Source: Geostat. National Statistics Office of Georgia. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Germany , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Germany , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2002
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Greece , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Hungary , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Hungary , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Hungary , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Hungary , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Hungary , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Hungary , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Iceland , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Ireland , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Ireland , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Italy , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Kosovo , Year: 2012
Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.
Country: Kosovo , Year: 2013
Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.
Country: Kosovo , Year: 2014
Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.
Country: Kosovo , Year: 2015
Source: Official Reports from KAS and WB (2012-2015, 2009-2011) and WB Kosovo Poverty Assessment 2007. Poverty line is absolute.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2006
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2007
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2008
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2009
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2010
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2011
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2012
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2013
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2014
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2015
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2016
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2017
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2018
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2019
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Kyrgyzstan , Year: 2020
Source: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Latvia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Latvia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Latvia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Latvia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Latvia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Latvia , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Lithuania , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Lithuania , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Lithuania , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Lithuania , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Lithuania , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Luxembourg , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Malta , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2005
Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2007, July 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2006
Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2007
Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2008
Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2009
Source: Poverty Analysis in Montenegro in 2008, Dec 2009. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2010
Source: National Source. POVERTY ANALYSIS IN MONTENEGRO IN 2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2011
Source: National Source. POVERTY ANALYSIS IN MONTENEGRO IN 2011. www.monstat.org. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Montenegro , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Netherlands , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Netherlands , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Netherlands , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Netherlands , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Netherlands , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Netherlands , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2002
Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2003
Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2004
Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2005
Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2006
Source: FYR Macedonia: Poverty, Jobs and Firms: An Assessment for 2002-06, Report No. 48510-MK, Nov 2009. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: North Macedonia , Year: 2018
Source: State Statistical Office, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2002
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Norway , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 1999
Source: Eurostat
Country: Poland , Year: 2000
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Poland , Year: 2001
Source: Poland: Growth, Employment and Living Standards in Pre-Accession Poland, Report No. 28233-POL, Mar 2004. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2002
Source: Poland: Growth, Employment and Living Standards in Pre-Accession Poland, Report No. 28233-POL, Mar 2004. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Poland , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Portugal , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Republic of Kazakhstan , Year: 2018
Source: The Household Budget Survey of Kazakhstan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Republic of Kazakhstan , Year: 2019
Source: The Household Budget Survey of Kazakhstan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Republic of Kazakhstan , Year: 2020
Source: The Household Budget Survey of Kazakhstan. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Republic of Moldova , Year: 2019
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Republic of Moldova , Year: 2020
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Romania , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT
Country: Romania , Year: 2014
Source: Eurostat
Country: Romania , Year: 2015
Source: Eurostat
Country: Romania , Year: 2016
Source: Eurostat
Country: Romania , Year: 2017
Source: Eurostat
Country: Romania , Year: 2018
Source: Eurostat
Country: Romania , Year: 2019
Source: Eurostat
Country: Romania , Year: 2020
Source: Eurostat
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2000
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2002
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2003
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2004
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2005
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2006
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2007
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2008
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2009
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2010
Source: Rosstat/WDI
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2011
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2012
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2013
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2014
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2015
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2016
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2017
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2018
Source: Federal State Statistics Service. The welfare measure used is consumption per capita. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2019
Source: Rosstat/WDI
Country: Russian Federation , Year: 2020
Source: Rosstat/WDI
Country: Serbia , Year: 2002
Source: Living standard Measurement Survey - Serbia 2002 - 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2004
Source: Background Paper on Trends and Profile of Poverty in Serbia: 2004-2006 - Serbia Poverty Assessment, June 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2006
Source: Background Paper on Trends and Profile of Poverty in Serbia: 2004-2006 - Serbia Poverty Assessment, June 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2007
Source: Living standard Measurement Survey - Serbia 2002 - 2007. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2008
Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Poverty in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2009
Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Poverty in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2010
Source: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2011) Poverty in the Republic of Serbia, 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Serbia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovakia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovenia , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovenia , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovenia , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovenia , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovenia , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Slovenia , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2003
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2004
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2005
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Spain , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Sweden , Year: 2020
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2006
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2007
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2008
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2009
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2010
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2011
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2012
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2013
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2014
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2015
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2018
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Switzerland , Year: 2019
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 1999
Source: Tajikistan PA 2012 - Input Tajikistan ER. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2003
Source: World Bank (2009). Republic of Tajikistan Poverty Assessment Report No. 51341-TJ. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2007
Source: Information Brief on poverty in Tajikistan prepared by Joost de Laat. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2009
Source: Information Brief on poverty in Tajikistan prepared by Joost de Laat. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2013
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2014
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2015
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2016
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2017
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2018
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Tajikistan , Year: 2019
Source: TajStat. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2001
Source: Eurostat
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2005
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2006
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2007
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2008
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2009
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2010
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2011
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2012
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2013
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2014
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2015
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2016
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2017
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2018
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: Türkiye , Year: 2019
Source: TurkStat. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate. (www.tuik.gov.tr)
Country: United Kingdom , Year: 2016
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: United Kingdom , Year: 2017
Source: EUROSTAT, At risk of poverty rate (cut-off point: 60% of median equivalised income after social transfers), reported year is income reference year. Poverty line is relative. Government estimate.
Country: Uruguay , Year: 2020
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica de Uruguay (INE) - Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH). Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2001
Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2002
Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2003
Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2004
Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2005
Source: Welfare improvement strategy of Uzbekistan. Full strategy paper for 2008-2010. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2010
Source: Living standards improvement strategy in the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2013-2015. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2011
Source: Living standards improvement strategy in the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2013-2015. Poverty line is absolute. Government estimate.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2012
Source: Most Recent Comparable Series:2012,2013. 2nd Most Recent Comparable Series:2010,2011. 3rd Most Recent Comparable Series:2001,2002,2003,2004,2005. The complete series can be downloaded from the databank, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=poverty-and-equity-database.
Country: Uzbekistan , Year: 2013
Source: Most Recent Comparable Series:2012,2013. 2nd Most Recent Comparable Series:2010,2011. 3rd Most Recent Comparable Series:2001,2002,2003,2004,2005. The complete series can be downloaded from the databank, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=poverty-and-equity-database.
Country: Argentina , Year: 2016
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Argentina , Year: 2017
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Argentina , Year: 2018
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Argentina , Year: 2019
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.
Country: Argentina , Year: 2020
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censos (INDEC), EPH-C, Second semester. Poverty line is absolute. World Bank estimate.